1 for routers and 2 for hosts. /jim
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of JINMEI Tatuya / ???? > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 1:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ICMPv6: Rate Limiting Configuration Per-Node or > Per-Interfaces > > >>>>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:51:49 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > So the question is: > > > In your opinion (no reasoning please), the rate limiting > configuration > > per-interface in the ICMPv6 spec should be a > > > 1) SHOULD > > 2) MAY > > 3) Any of them is fine for you. > > > My choice is 3. > > I prefer 3, then 2. I would not take option 1. > > JINMEI, Tatuya > Communication Platform Lab. > Corporate R&D Center, > Toshiba Corp. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
