Proposed Resolution: - add a reference to RFC3810 as well as to RFC2710
- make a small modification to the 5th paragraph of section 5.4.2 to: Note that when a node joins a multicast address, it typically sends a Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) report message [RFC2710] for the multicast address. In the case of Duplicate Address Detection the MLD report message is required in order to inform MLD-snooping switches, rather than routers, to forward multicast packets. In the above description, the delay for joining the multicast address thus means delaying transmission of the corresponding MLD report message [RFC2710]. Since [RFC2710] does not request a random delay to avoid race conditions, just delaying Neighbor Solicitation would cause congestion by the MLD report messages. The congestion would then prevent the MLD-snooping switches from working correctly, and, as a result, prevent Duplicate Address Detection from working. The requirement to include the delay for the MLD report in this case avoids this scenario. [RFC3590] specifies which source address should be used for the MLD report when no valid local addresses has yet been configured. See the following link and its follow-ups for more details: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg03386.html I'm going to close the issue with the change. If anyone of you have an objection, please speak up ASAP. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
