On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 08:34 -0500, Bound, Jim wrote: > I am not speaking to you anymore on the IETF and I do recall you now > from Brussels and your manners were the same there and your innuendos > without facts.
Ahem? I *asked* you a simple question then: "What is the actual usage". This is what I ask mostly anybody I meet who is saying they are doing IPv6 connectivity, just out of pure interest and also most of the time to try and help people out to get actual traffic on the wires and to get it to the end users. I always present facts, but as you can't come up with them you apparently like to only put me off as a child. Well you are playing this game the completely wrong way. I am quite sure that the Chairs of this WG and the Area Directors can give some good comments about this style of messaging from you. Of course if it seems unfit what I am doing they can say that also, please do, but I think that those people at least will come up with an exact list of items what is so wrong about me then. > You insulted me and others thus you forfeit your right > to respect, at least from me, for some period. I or no one on this mail > list should have to put up with whiny gutless wonder email insulting > anal retentive commentary. Can you please tell me what did I insult you with? Is a question, such as the above so bad? I really wonder what I did to you to receive such answers from you. Which wrong side of the bed did you woke up from for the last couple of years? > Period. I will respond to you with my private > thoughts on your behavior and I believe you need a serious attitude > adjustment, and I am very open to helping you make that adjustment in > person some day. I will be back to you via personal email account and > will make it very clear to you how out of line you are and a few other > suggestions privately. I am very sorry for you that you have to act in such a way, certainly with all those 'nice supportive' and backed-up words you are mentioning above. Looks more like it is time to start fathering your own kids instead of trying to be the big bad bully and trying to push me in a corner, which really won't work with me, you picked the wrong person. I thought that the IETF was supposed to be an organization of professionals who could talk to each other, but the only thing you can come up with is accusations which don't make any sense at all. Greets, Jeroen PS: I really hope that somebody else is typing those silly messages on your behalf, you could claim that btw, no PGP signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
