-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2005-03-17, at 15.02, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Kurtis Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Shouldn't we be a bit more explicit on what routers/hosts should do >> with >> these addresses when found? > > We're already allowing for multiple behaviours. Being more explicit > (about what those behaviours are) could be more confusing than helpful. But the behaviour when receiving a deprecated address might be better off being consistent? - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQj/Xo6arNKXTPFCVEQJHEQCdHzTkhvbO5WQ11nXsHx+BVSzSJToAoJVc NO3XbVMHLWoKr96ItX94Hcc6 =T10b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
