(Sorry for the long delay for this thread. I've been off-list for a
vacation.)
>>>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:33:45 -0700,
>>>>> Bob Hinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Anycast is complicated, and the complications are not specific to
>> IPv6. It really would be doing the world a favor if the IPv6 WG were
>> to get rid of the language in the IPv6 address architecture doc that
>> places IPv6-specific restrictions on anycast, then let the GROW WG
>> handle the general anycast problem.
> OK, I think this makes sense.
> The proposal is then to remove the following text from the end of Section
> 2.6 the document:
> There is little experience with widespread, arbitrary use of Internet
[...]
> Is everyone else OK with this proposed change?
I generally agree with the change, but I'm afraid a fresh reader of
this RFC-to-be will wonder about the removal, comparing to RFC3315.
So it would be nice to provide at least a pointer to relevant
discussion/drafts.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
