sure but breaking production code has to jump a higher bar regardless and I am not convinced that all have come to good set of statements and assumptions what those bits mean right now and I think that is prudent before changing them. prefix delegation puts another and new variable in the analysis I think now.
/jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Lemon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 12:40 PM > To: Bound, Jim > Cc: Bernie Volz (volz); dhcwg@ietf.org; Iljitsch van Beijnum; > ipv6@ietf.org; Ralph Droms (rdroms) > Subject: Re: [dhcwg] RE: purpose of m/o bit > > On May 27, 2005, at 9:35 AM, Bound, Jim wrote: > > ughh. sorry know of three production servers in use Lucent, HP, and > > Linux version. > > > > That's not what I mean. The point is that it's early days, and > updating servers isn't a hard problem. My point is that I don't > know of any widespread deployments we'd be breaking right now, not > that there are no implementations. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
