On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 11:29, Soliman, Hesham wrote: > > It would be better than what's there now, but ideally, the > > text should > > just be removed entirely. > > Doing address resolution on multiple links > > can lead to ambiguous results. There could be multiple destinations > > responding to the same address, and you don't know which one you're > > talking to. This hasn't been studied enough to even be > > mentioned. > > => Agreed. That's why it's in an appendix. Anyway, if no one has a problem > with removing this text I'm fine with removing it. >
I agree that it should be removed. It seems completely out of place given that the on-link assumption has been removed from the specification. tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
