I was writing in response to Christian's comments about potential interaction between sdtateless address autoconfiguration and DHCpv6 on a host.
As you said, in the current architecture all hosts on a link see the same RAs and will use stateless address autoconfiguration and DHCPv6 in the same way. Perhaps there needs to be some additional work on the architecture... - Ralph On 3/22/06 1:29 AM, "Durand, Alain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ralph Droms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 12:28 AM >> To: Christian Huitema; Fred Baker; Thomas Narten >> Cc: Durand, Alain; IPv6 Mailing List; Bob Hinden >> Subject: Re: Proposed M&O bits text for RFC2461bis >> >> There is very little to be said about auto-conf/DHCPv6 interaction: >> >> DHCPv6 and stateless address auto-configuration and the >> addresses assigned through each process are independent of >> each other. A node may run either, both or neither DHCPv6 and SLAAC. > > Ralph, > > The issue is not with the assignment part, but with the decision > about which one is going to be used. > > - Alain. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
