Folks, Please take a look at Bob's text below. I'd like to suggest that we replace the current text in 2461bis with the one below. Any objections? I'll wait for another week before I can conclude that we agree on this, i.e. if no one responds.
Hesham > For example: > > M : > 1-bit "Managed address configuration" flag. When set, it > indicates that addresses are available via Dynamic Host > Configuration Protocol [DHCPv6]. > > If the M flag is set, the O flag is redundant and can be > ignored because DHCPv6 will return all available > configuration > information. > > O : > 1-bit "Other configuration" flag. When set, it > indicates that > other configuration information is available via DHCPv6. > Examples of such information are DNS-related information or > information on other servers within the network. > > Note: If neither M nor O flags are set this indicates that no > information is available via DHCP. > > ----- > > I made the assumption that from the clients point of view, > DHCPv6 and > DHCPv6-lite are equivalent and didn't call out DHCPv6-lite > separately > in the O flag description. Please correct me if I am wrong > about this. > > Comments? > > Bob > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
