Hello. In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 29 May 2006 19:23:36 +0900), Arifumi Matsumoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> * to update default rule. > The default rule today is: > Prefix Precedence Label > ::1/128 50 0 > ::/0 40 1 > 2002::/16 30 2 > ::/96 20 3 > ::ffff:0:0/96 10 4 > > What we should consider now is, > - IPv4-compatible IPv6 address is deprecated.(RFC4291) > - Teredo is defined. (RFC4380) : > - ULA should have less precedence than IPv4. : > Prefix Precedence Label > ::1/128 50 0 > ::/0 40 1 > 2002::/16 30 2 > ::ffff:0:0/96 10 3 > fc00::/7 8 4 > 2001::/32 5 5 It is fine to add fc00::/7 and 2001::/32 is fine, however, it is not good to delete ::/96. Please don't introduce incompatibility here. Peserve current label even if we remove ::/96; e.g. Prefix Precedence Label ::1/128 50 0 ::/0 40 1 2002::/16 30 2 ::ffff:0:0/96 10 4 fc00::/7 8 5 2001::/32 5 6 is fine. Regards, --yoshfuji -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------