>From: Ole Troan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 2006/08/23 Wed AM 12:57:16 CDT
>To: Syam Madanapalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
>Subject: Re: Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6

>I don't understand the rationale for this work either.

Hi Ole, thanks for the reply. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you.

>
>the first PD proposal (by Brian Haberman) was indeed based on using
>ICMP as transport. separate message types instead of
>piggy-backing on RS/RA though.

Yes, absolutely. The Haberman draft is just one of three such docs of which I'm 
aware:

1.draft-haberman-ipngwg-auto-prefix-02.txt
2.draft-bykim-ipv6-hpd-01.txt
3.draft-arunt-prefix-delegation-using-icmpv6-00.txt

>as we continued to develop that
>mechanism we realised that we were pretty much reinventing the DHCP
>protocol machine. that realisation led to specifying it as an DHCP
>option instead of as a new protocol.

I see what you're saying. I should say that our proposed PD mechanism is more 
representative of the extension of RS/RA functionality than the creation of an 
entirely new protocol.

>
>a technical comment on your proposal; how do you plan to support
>shared links with multiple requesting routers?

Have you had an opportunity to read our proposal in its entirety? Here is a cut 
from our text (section 4, page 5) which I hope will answer that question:

"There may be cases where more than one DR is present on the link shared with 
the RN.  In cases such as this, the RN will choose as its DR the PD capable 
router whose solicited RA it received first.

Subsequent RAs received from the remaining on-link PD-capable routers will be 
ignored."


>RAs are typically multicast.

Yes and no. An unsolicited RA is typically multicast, whereas a solicited RA 
would be unicast.

Best Regards,

Tim
Rom 8:28

>
>/ot
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>ipv6@ietf.org
>Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>--------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to