> But, I was "shouted" down, so I don't oppose it either. Perhaps, but this also makes it sound like there were now compelling reasons to oppose the change.
Fact is, the IPv6 WG made the decision a long time ago (10+ years?) that even if snooping bridges are an abomination (and many people think they are), they were to be supported anyway. This is just carrying over from IPv4 a feature that was felt to be needed. Way too late to roll back the clock now. Thomas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
