> => I agree with this. Pekka himself mentioned that this is > not a compliant behviour according to 2461. A contant is a > *contant*, which means it doesn't change :) ....
=> I obviously meant constant :) Hesham > Variables are also given max and min values, which by the > english meaning of max and min implies that you can't go > outside those boundaries. So I don't see the gain in adding > that "protocol constants MUST be used" or something like that. > > Hesham > > > > > > > > I do not see any benefit in having any > > specification state *which* components of the document > are normative. > > > > Regards, > > Brian > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > > iD8DBQFFk871FShYTeGgKiYRCPx8AKC8V6OuAVzbTouoPkQcP928EeifYACdEYnR > > Z4w2IEwW0XV18LLxOWTSlvc= > > =J1Ds > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > ipv6@ietf.org > > Administrative Requests: > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
