Iljitsch, >> With regard to IPv4, ADs seemed to feel that it should be addressed >> in a separate document. > > Why? Are we going to have separate documents for IPv4 and IPv6 until > the end of time, even if the issues overlap 80%?
I have found that its management-wise easier to deal with small documents and small steps. Delay in one part does not cause delay in another. Updates: -header will look simpler. Normative references point only to the things that you need to implement. Etc. Jari -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
