On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Jeroen Massar wrote:
<snip>
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Operators have said that they will not be able to use ULA, but they could
use ULA-C, for example for thinks like microallocations for internal
infrastructure's.
what operators? I cant remember to have seen one operator supporting that
point of view. My point of view from a LIR/network point of view etc was
that ULA-C could be usefull but without reverse DNS it is useless. Maybe
even with reverse DNS we want todo it the correct way by using our
netblock we got from RIPE.
--
------------------------------
Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | - IPv6 is The Key!
-------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
