Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Scott Leibrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I would support Paul's proposed changes below, and the resulting draft. > > I wouldn't, at this time. We need to see where the RAM/RRG discussions > lead. If they lead to a clear need for registered globally unique > identifiers in IPv6 address format, something like this might be right > (unless we also need a cryptographic property).
where are those discussions being held, and can you post a summary, and why are we wasting our keystrokes discussing this if there's a preclusive topic being discussed somewhere entirely else? > I have a strong feeling there is no consensus forming... i disagree, i've been immersed in this for a month now, and my draft edits as proposed last night represent my understanding of a potential consensus, which unlike you i can feel forming. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
