On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Jeroen Massar wrote: <snip>
I think that ULA-C is a really really bad idea because of this. But I'll let other people figure that out, I've clearly spoken my mind about this already. I do hope that other people see this too.
yes it is a bad idea, but for the time being, it seems to be the right thing. Might even be necesary for IPv6 deployment to. For us, where I work, ULA-C is great, it give us everything we want. PI or/and PA will do the same job but ULA-C is easier to use, nothing else.
-- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - IPv6 is The Key! ------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
