Thus spake "Paul Vixie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
in RFC 1918 land, it's impossible for a root name server to know where the
junk-source queries are coming from, since 192.168.1.100 looks the same no
matter who leaks it. in any ULA plan, "recourse" has to exist, such that
when someone sends you a DNS query you can't reply to because it's from a
ULA-verse that you're not part of, you can still look it up in WHOIS.
Wouldn't such packets be considered bogons and get blocked (either via
specific filters for fc00::/7 or uRPF) at the edge of your network before
the server even saw them?
Besides, ULA (RFC 4193) blocks _can't_ be registered because there is no
central authority and no guaranteed uniqueness. ULA-C/G are different
beasts, and if passed should have WHOIS and RDNS servers.
S
Stephen Sprunk "Those people who think they know everything
CCIE #3723 are a great annoyance to those of us who do."
K5SSS --Isaac Asimov
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
