Hi Hemant,
Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
Sorry, if I missed the paragraph Tatuya wanted to add. As I said before,
could I please see the new para for section 5.4.4 of 2461bis and I will
The edit he was proposing was for 2462bis not 2461bis. The old para in
section 5.4.4
On receipt of a valid Neighbor Advertisement message on an interface,
node behavior depends on whether the target address is tentative or
matches a unicast or anycast address assigned to the interface. If
the target address is assigned to the receiving interface, the
solicitation is processed as described in [I-D.ietf-ipv6-2461bis].
If the target address is tentative, the tentative address is not
unique.
will be replaced with the new paragraph
On receipt of a valid Neighbor Advertisement message on an interface,
node behavior depends on whether the target address is tentative or
matches a unicast or anycast address assigned to the interface. If
the target address is assigned to the receiving interface, the
advertisement SHOULD be silently discarded. If the target address is
tentative, the tentative address is not unique.
Since there is no text in 2461bis to directly handle this condition, I
believe that the suggested text makes sense.
Cheers
Suresh
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
