At Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:00:10 -0400, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though putting this into a list (1., 2., 3.) would likely make it > much more readable and parseable. > > On receipt of a valid Neighbor Advertisement message on an > > interface, node behavior depends on whether the target address is > > tentative or matches a unicast or anycast address assigned to the > > interface: > > 1. If the target address is tentative, the tentative > > address is not unique. > > 2. If the target address matches a > > unicast address assigned to the receiving interface, the > > advertisement SHOULD be discarded and the node SHOULD log a system > > management error; this case would indicate that the address is a > > duplicate but it has not been detected by the Duplicate Address > > Detection procedure, which should be manually handled by the > > system administrator. > > 3. Otherwise, the advertisement is processed as described > > in [I-D.ietf-ipv6-2461bis]. I tend to agree (I also thought this as an option myself). Thanks for the suggestion. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------