Processing RH0 does not mean a host acts as a bounce point. If a node
decides to forward traffic it is a router.  A host can properly process an
RH0 packet and drop it if one of its other addresses is not the next hop. 

I object to the entire hysteria driven effort to deprecate RH0. 

Tony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Abley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 6:55 AM
> To: Christopher Morrow
> Cc: IPv6 WG
> Subject: Re: IPv6 WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-rh0-01.txt>
> 
> 
> On 6-Jul-2007, at 00:31, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> 
> > I hesitate to get rid or something because of this sole reason, I
> > think another answer would be to make paying attention to it just
> > optional for routing gear (or all things, honestly I really only care
> > about routing gear, and so does this draft).
> 
> Actually, no -- hosts which conform to the current spec also process
> RH0. So even if all IPv6 routers had RH0 functionality removed, hosts
> could still act as bounce points for the purposes of congesting
> remote paths.
> 
> > I'd also take issue, for many of the same reasons stated earlier
> with:
> >
> > "The severity of this threat is considered to be sufficient to
> warrant
> >   deprecation of RH0 entirely"
> >
> > from the draft, I don't think that deprecation is warranted in this
> > case, if it is than anything that can cause amplification attacks is
> > likely also in need of deprecation.
> 
> So, to summarise: your proposal is that RH0 should not be deprecated,
> but that it should be made optional? I'm not convinced that I
> understand how that's going to prevent the "amplification over remote
> paths" problem.
> 
> Note too that several widely-deployed IPv6 stacks have already taken
> the approach of effectively deprecating RH0. So there's a practical
> consideration that if we decide to do something different, we are
> diverging from deployed practice.
> 
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to