On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:25:56 +0100 Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Vixie wrote: > > > in any case i called it "local" in ULA-G because i was stealing wholesale > > from > > ULA-C (and i suspect they called it "local" because they were stealing from > > ULA). if you propose a term other than "private" (which is taken by RFC > > 1918) > > that means "non-public" in the sense meant by ULA-G and ULA-C and ULA, there > > might be great rejoicing. > *** "INTERNAL" *** Woohoo, I'm off to party! (at work) -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
