> I wonder if ISATAP needs to be included here. I am sort of still wondering this, too. But, see below and also Suresh's follow-up message.
> It was my understanding that you > cannot use non-ISATAP IIDs on ISATAP virtual links, Correct. > and that ISATAP IIDs had no particular meaning on non ISATAP links. Also correct, which is why I tried to convince Suresh that their inclusion in his list was not necessary. > Or perhaps, is the intent merely to avoid human confusion? AFAICT, this would be the one reason for including the IIDs in Suresh's list. Maybe there is still some potential issue for mis-configuration here that would warrant keeping them on the list? Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > Rémi Denis-Courmont > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
