On Jul 26, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
Hi Chris,
Christopher Morrow wrote:
On 7/26/07, Brian Haberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
The working group's work items are as follows:
o Shepherd completion of standardization of the RH0 Deprecation
document
...
All new work items not listed above require the approval of the
working
group and IESG before they will be taken on by the working group.
I didn't think there was consensus on the RH0 direction yet, was
there?
There was consensus to create an IPv6 WG document to address the issue
of the RH0 security hole. The result of that consensus is what is
documented in this draft that recently went through an IPv6 WG last
call.
For the history there, please see the mailing list message
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg07408.html
Regards,
Brian
It seemed as though a number of folks joined the discussion after the
original consensus call, and that many of these individuals did not
support deprecation. Perhaps a new consensus call would be appropriate.
R,
Dow
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
