Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > On Thursday 26 July 2007 21:23:22 Jari Arkko wrote: >> Let me just add something on this: >>> For example, the deployment >>> of new transition tools is out of scope of this working group. >>> Proposals for work beyond the scope of this working group should be sent >>> to relevant ADs. >> This is a topic that I would like to see discussed in the >> the IETF, at least in the form of asking whether we >> have requirements for new work. The new maintenance >> group that we are creating is not the right place for >> that discussion, but I do want to have a forum. Stay >> tuned. > > Yup. What about maintenance of existing non-core specifications, by the way?
Do you have an example of such a specification you are worried about? Regards, Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
