Hi Jason, Jason Schiller wrote:
I would be curious how people feel about these choices if they also apply to (as they should) IPv4 source routing.
I think the problems, though overlapping, are completely different in magnitude. The problem with IPv4 source routing is not AS SEVERE as the problem with RH0. The main issue I have with RH0 is the NUMBER OF ADDRESSES that can occur in the header, rather than the concept itself. I don't think there is a valid use case for this number of addresses as allowed for in RH0.
Cheers Suresh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
