Hi.
If I understand what you are asking correctly, I think you have misread
RFC 2675/2460. The jumbogram option lives in the hop-by-by-hop
extension header (Header Type (Next header value) 0, option type code C2
hex). The routing header is a a different extension header (Header Type
43). Jumbograms are therefore not affected by the deprecation of RH0
(Header Type 43, Routing Type 0).
Regards,
Elwyn
Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
Perhaps this was covered in the RH0 deprecation discussions and I missed
it. How will jumbograms be coded in the IPv6 header if RH0 is rejected,
at some point? Since both a length of 0 bytes and RH0 are expected in
the IPv6 header, to indicate jumbogram (RFC 2675).
Bert
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
