sorry, replied to author with typos, but neglected to state my support
for the draft on the list. I agree it is a good idea to document and
advance the idea of a registry.
one substantive comment was that the example of a conflicting IID
FDFF:FFF:FFF:FFFE should cite the source of the conflicting definition
(RFC 2526).
Brian Haberman wrote:
All,
This message starts a 3-week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on
advancing:
Title : Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifiers
Author(s) : S. Krishnan
Filename : draft-ietf-6man-reserved-iids-00.txt
Pages : 11
Date : 2008-02-08
as a Proposed Standard. Substantive comments and statements of
support for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing
list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the document editor. This
last call will end on July 10, 2008.
Regards,
Brian & Bob
6MAN co-chairs
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Ed Jankiewicz - SRI International
Fort Monmouth Branch Office - IPv6 Research
Supporting DISA Standards Engineering Branch
732-389-1003 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
