John,

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Basavaraj Patil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>
> Hi John,
>
>
> On 11/17/08 9:10 AM, "John Loughney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pekka,
> >
> >> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Daniel Park wrote:
> >>> I would make a minor change according to the valuable comments from
> >>> the WiMAX expert:
> >>>
> >>> There are two ways to transfer IPv6 over WiMAX:
> >>> - IPv6 over WiMAX using IPCS: RFC5121
> >>> - IPv6 over Ethernet carried over WiMAX: AD Evaluation (ID Status)
> >>>
> >>> So.
> >>>
> >>> 4.X IP version 6 over WiMAX - RFC 5121
> >>>
> >>> Nodes supporting IPv6 via IPCS over WiMAX networks MUST implement
> >>>
> >>> "Transmission of IPv6 via the IPv6 Convergence Sublayer over IEEE
> >>> 802.16 Networks" [RFC 5121].
> >>
> >> This is almost like a tautology.  What use is having this kind
> >> of statements in an RFC?  If someone needs to implement IPv6
> >> using IP convergence Sublayer on a WIMAX network and already
> >> knows of RFCs, (s)he can certainly find the RFC without such a
> >> reference here.
> >>
> >> A statement is much more useful if it actually conveys some
> >> new information.  Such as providing guidance (or links to
> >> guidance) on when one should choose WiMAX using IPCS or
> >> Ethernet-adapation, or possibly some third (or fourth) option.
> >
> > That makes sense, we should add more text to provide more guidence here.
>
> WiMAX forum specifications and documents provide sufficient information
> about when to use IPCS or Eth CS. Mobile WiMAX networks in general rely on
> IPCS. I don't think that this document should be providing guidance on when
> to use IPCS vs Eth CS vs GPCS. It is better to simply provide the
> appropriate reference to WMF documents.


Agreed, I think we don't need more text for CS in Node-Req. If anyone want
to know about CS more, they can refer to RFC 5121 as well as WiMAX
specification which is already in the list of references of RFC 5121.


Daniel

<snip>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to