Gabi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Gabi Nakibly [mailto:gnaki...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 12:07 PM > To: Templin, Fred L; v6ops > Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; sec...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Routing loop attacks using IPv6 tunnels > > Correct. All the attacks rely on the fact that the ISATAP router encapsulates/decapsulates a packet > the 6to4 relay decapsulates/encapsulates, respectively. So the two tunnels must have the same > encapsulation type.
OK. That will greatly simplify the checks needed for new automatic tunneling protocols that have a format other than ip-proto-41. Fred fred.l.temp...@boeing.com > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: "Templin, Fred L" <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com> > > To: Gabi Nakibly <gnaki...@yahoo.com>; v6ops <v6...@ops.ietf.org> > > Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; sec...@ietf.org > > Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 7:23:03 PM > > Subject: RE: Routing loop attacks using IPv6 tunnels > > > > Gabi, > > > > Correct me if I am wrong, but if there were a new version > > of ISATAP that did not use ip-proto-41 encapsulation but > > instead used a different kind of encapsulation, then it > > need not concern itself with routing loop interactions > > with 6to4 relays since 6to4 relays only know about > > ip-proto-41. Does that match your understanding? > > > > Thanks - Fred > > fred.l.temp...@boeing.com > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
