I would again like to return to this draft. I realize its a small
matter, but I wouldn't like to hold the draft in this state forever. Can
we adopt this in the WG and move it forward to an RFC?
Jari
Brian Haberman wrote:
Jari,
As an individual contributor, I am happy with the rules specified
in this draft and support adoption by the working group. I was also
unable to find any other RFC or draft that specified the IANA rules
for the routing header Type field.
Regards,
Brian
Jari Arkko wrote:
I spoke about this a little bit in the meeting and got a few
comments. But as far as I can tell, I never got any responses to my
question in March on the mailing list. Perhaps this is a proper time
to ask again... this is really a minor thing, but I would like to fix
a bug in the IANA registries when I see one. Comments and suggestions
would be appreciated.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
