On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Ralph Droms <rdr...@cisco.com> wrote: > They don't actually need a full DHCPv6 server. Support of > Information-request/Reply/Reconfigure would be sufficient.
I think we're spliting hairs... but eventually someone's going to want to do all portions of dhcpv6 and NOT do it on a server. Perhaps looking at this another way, someone's going to recognize that 'root nfsmount' (or something else odd) is helpful to their cause, and not want to do that on a dedicated DHCPv6 server, they'll get a vendor to implement that 'feature' for them. my point is... it's not one or the other, there will be a myraid of cases in the middle, which is perfectly fine. -chris -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
