Le 14/04/2010 22:23, Philip Levis a écrit :
On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Hi, I came across this draft coming from the ROLL space where a
proposal exists to use the Flow Label changed enroute maybe.
Alex,
I think you're misrepresenting ROLL here, even though (after your
objections there) the use of the flow label was very clearly
described a few days ago. Changing the flow label enroute is not on
the table in ROLL; it was a while ago as a crazy idea, then everyone
realized the issues it would create.
Sorry for misunderstanding...
(only a day ago it was stated in ROLL list that changing the flow label
enroute is possible as long as it is restored...)
I guess I have to wait and see.
Alex
Phil
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
