I support this effort as I think it will "future proof" extension headers as far as stateful firewalls are concerned - but what I'm interested in is finding out how much demand for new extension headers there is out there - and what those new extension headers would be.
- Wes -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:17 AM To: IPv6 WG Mailing List Subject: Consensus call on adopting draft-krishnan-ipv6-exthdr All, The 6MAN chairs would like feedback from the working group on adopting draft-krishnan-ipv6-exthdr as a WG item. Please send your comments/opinions to the mailing list (or the chairs) by May 7, 2010. Regards, Brian & Bob -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
