Fernando, On Nov 19, 2010, at 19:41 MST, Fernando Gont wrote: > On 19/11/2010 06:23 p.m., Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Well, one point is that there is surely no rush to publish your >> draft, given the current level of usage of the flow label, >> so we can take the time to ensure that the normative references >> are correct in the end. > > Agreed. - My thought was that it could be published along with 3697bis... > > So I'd personally not work on the "requirements" section, particularly > because it needs to (and will) reflect what is included in 3697bis.
To close out this thread ... it sounds like we have a general agreement/understanding on when draft-gont-6man-flowlabel-security will create new flow-label values, but we'll pause on updating it until RFC3697bis is out there and then we can make sure both drafts are appropriately aligned. Thanks! -shane -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
