On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 09:20 -0500, Thomas Narten wrote: > This is at best poorly phrased. :-) > > If the firewall will just dig one layer deeper and then discard > anyway, what is the point?
+1 I still don't understand what this draft solves that couldn't be solved more easily by just encoding future header extensions as either Destination options or Hop-by-Hop options? Both of these are easy to parse and have well defined rules for how to handle unknown options. Regards, // Steve -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
