Pekka Savola <pek...@netcore.fi> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Thomas Narten wrote: >>>This message starts a 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing: >> >>> Title : IPv6 Node Requirements RFC 4294-bis >>> Author(s) : E. Jankiewicz, et al. >>> Filename : draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-07.txt > > I have reviewed this document. > > The most important omission is that RFC4294 changelog is not up-to-date. > This gives a good overview on what has changed and it needs to convey > accurate information.
Comparing bis-07 to RFC 4294, the number of changes begins to boggle... I strongly concur with Pekka that this document needs a single "changes from 4294" section. And, seeing as 4294 will be five years old by the time 4294-bis is published, I'd suggest adding to that section a note on where to look for "pending" changes over the next five years. ;^) (BTW, I remain confused on what happened to 5.2.1 of 4294 "Managed Address Configuration". Hopefully that will become clearer with a single "changes since 4294" section.) (I suppose this means I volunteer to help draft such a section, but to tell truth I'm not sure where to start!) -- John Leslie <j...@jlc.net> -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
