On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, james woodyatt wrote:
On Feb 18, 2011, at 17:44, Mark Smith wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:55:18 +0200 (EET) Pekka Savola <pek...@netcore.fi> wrote:
RFC4191 (Default Router Preferences and More-Specific Routes) should be
discussed. Is this a MAY? Quite a few host implementations already support
it.
I think this should be a MUST, or at least a SHOULD, as the simple CPE
draft relies on this capability to support routing between internal
subnets if the WAN link is down
Which host implementations support the More-specific Routes option? I'm aware
of at least one major family of implementations that does not support it, i.e.
Mac OS X and iOS.
It's my understanding that Linux and Windows both support both the
prefererence and more-specific route options.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
