On 2011-02-22 01:28, John Leslie wrote:
> Pekka Savola <pek...@netcore.fi> wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Feb 2011, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> On 2011-02-18 21:55, Pekka Savola wrote:
>>>
>>>> The document is silent on Flow Label (as Brian mentioned).  Rather than
>>>> silence, I might be tempted to say something at least from the current
>>>> perspective.  The key point here is, "are hosts expected to randomize or
>>>> otherwise by default set a flow label"?
> 
>    This document is not the place to say that: it says _where_to_look_
> for such specifications.
> 
>>> Until we have settled on 3697bis, there is no answer to that question.
>>> I think it would be misleading to mention it.
> 
>    ... but it probably is reasonable to mention 3697bis as work in
> progress.
> 
>> Section S 5.1 already has a MUST requirement for supporting RFC2460. 
>> RFC2460 main body and appendix describe the behaviour for assigning 
>> flows at the originating node.  This was made more specific in RFC3697 
>> that updated 2460.
> 
>    Saying just-that is reasonable.

Well, I object to drawing anyone's attention to the Appendix of
2460, which is explicitly not part of the standard. And I think
that the main text in 2460 is underspecified, whereas RFC 3697
has proved to be plain confusing. And we don't yet have clear
consenus on 3697bis. Does all this belong in a requirements list?

    Brian

> 
>> Given the situation we already have, I think it would be best to 
>> address this point by describing what we currently have already 
>> specified and the document requires.  A warning "This behaviour is 
>> being revised." would be sufficient to address upgrade path issues.
> 
>    This document should not try to be authoritative on Flow Label.
> We could be more specific on where-to-look, but I'm not convinced
> that will be helpful: where-to-look, IMHO, is 3697bis. ;^)
> 
> --
> John Leslie <j...@jlc.net>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to