On 2011-02-23 10:23, John Leslie wrote: > Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2011-02-22 19:24, Pekka Savola wrote: >>> Which part of 3697 that is relevant to this document is plain >>> confusing? Those that pertain to this spec are IMHO in Section 3 which >>> seems clear enough to me (copied below). >> But this text will be completely different in 3697bis. I really >> wouldn't want to set people off coding according to something that >> we already know will change. > > All the more reason this document should mention both 3697 _and_ that > we expect it to change.
That would do no harm. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------