> On Mar 3, 2011, at 2:10 PM, TJ wrote: >> Really? None of the ISPs I have spoken with, and certainly none of >> the ones I have worked with, are following a /64 per client plan. I >> have discussed /48s vs /56s vs /60s ... but never a /64.
James Woodyatt wrote: > Here is a Reddit commenter from Canada who claims to have been > delegated a native /64 prefix by some unnamed service provider: > > <http://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/fvvh9/i_am_a_verizon_fios_custom > erwhen_can_i_get_on_ipv6/c1j10sy> > > Not sure how credible that claim can be regarded, but it's a claim that > can be checked. I've certainly seen ISPs suggesting that they would do this. But a quick search turned up this, dated 2/8/2011: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-512#end_site 5.4.1. Assignment address space size End Users are assigned an End Site assignment from their LIR or ISP. The size of the assignment is a local decision for the LIR or ISP to make, using a minimum value of a /64 (only one subnet is anticipated for the End Site). So, is anyone willing to bet that ISPs won't use /64s? Bert -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
