On Mar 7, 2011, at 11:44 AM, james woodyatt wrote: > On Mar 7, 2011, at 4:13 AM, huabing yu wrote: >> >> Implementations for which privacy considerations outweigh these application >> compatibility concerns MAY reverse the sense of this rule and by default >> prefer temporary addresses over public addresses. > > This. Application compatibility concerns almost never trump privacy > concerns. And when they do, it's usually a source of shame.
It really depends on the nature of the application. Some applications need relatively stable addresses; others don't. There's nothing shameful about needing relatively stable addresses. Keith
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
