On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 01:58:43PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 04/14/2011 13:23, Richard Hartmann wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >after renaming to draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming, I am still > >waiting for feedback. > > > > > >I am not sure how the exact procedures are: Does lack of feedback mean > >people are mostly OK with this or that no one cares? > > To be painfully honest, most likely the latter, sorry. I've never > had a problem with "field" as the description, and have never been > confused because that's not a unique term. I agree with Karl that > hextet is right out. I actually like the term quibble, because of > (rather than in spite of) its alternate meaning, given how > contentious various elements of v6 design have been, and continue to > be. (It also rhymes with nibble.)
I happen to agree. I don't see the point. After all, what are the numbers between the dots in IPv4 addresses called? -- Scott Schmit -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
