On 11/17/11 12:00 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Dear 6man, > > Kerry and I talked about this. It seems to me that, given we allow for > IPv6 literals in URIs principally for diagnostic purposes, it is indeed > unfortunate that http://[fe80::206:98ff:fe00:232%tap0] is not > allowed by the formal syntax. > > This would need to be fixed by a small RFC that updates 3986, > just as 2732 updated 2396 in its day. > > Do people agree that this is a reasonable thing to do? If so, I'll > follow it up appropriately (i.e. I will draft something when time permits).
I agree that it is reasonable to do. Regards, Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
