Hi, Everyone's favourite topic is back. There is pretty good chance that current discussion will lead to either publication of draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option or its abandonment.
If you care about this topic, you are encouraged to read and post in: Why we need route option thread: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif/current/msg01431.html Why we should drop route option thread: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif/current/msg01432.html There are questions raised if MIF is the best place for this option, but since it is adopted there, MIF list seems like a reasonable place to discuss its faith. There are at least 5 (DHC, MIF, HOMENET, V6OPS, 6MAN) WGs that may be interested in this. There may be others. I consider cross-posting to 5 mailing lists as highly inappropriate. Similar posts as this will be sent to DHC, HOMENET, V6OPS and 6MAN shortly. Cheers, Tomek Mrugalski ISC -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------