[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-19097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-19097.
---------------------------------
    Resolution: Information Provided

> Using Camel as a REST client towards a REST service hosted by JBoss EAP 7.4 
> leads to connections in TCP/IP state CLOSE_WAIT on the server side.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-19097
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-19097
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: camel-http, camel-netty4-http
>    Affects Versions: 2.25.3
>            Reporter: Philipp Bachmann
>            Priority: Major
>
> Even though a similar / identical phenomenon has popped up both on 
> [[email protected]|mailto:[email protected]] and at 
> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53258874/http-and-https-connections-are-kept-in-close-wait-if-using-apache-camel>,
>  I could not find a solution so far.
> To my understanding Camel as a REST client closes the connection, that's why 
> the server's TCP/IP state switches to CLOSE_WAIT, but it should do so only 
> temporarily until the server code also closes the respective connection. 
> This, however, does not seem to happen, leaving its end of the connection in 
> CLOSE_WAIT state "forever."
> We triggered the very same REST service using SoapUI as a REST client. In 
> this case, the server correctly closes its end of the TCP/IP connection.
> So the Camel implementation seems to somehow contribute to this behavior of 
> JBoss EAP, even though I'd still say that JBoss should reliably end its 
> connection if the client already did so regardless of the details exchanged 
> via this connection before, i. e. regardless of whether SoapUI or Camel was 
> the client.
> So: 1) Are there known workarounds / additional URL endpoint parameters to 
> set on the Camel side to avoid this behavior?
> 2) To further analyze what's really going on here it might prove useful to 
> route the REST connection via a web proxy like mitmproxy. How can I do this 
> with the least possible modifications to the respective Camel endpoint 
> definition?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to