[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-13503:
-----------------------------------
    Labels: auto-unassigned pull-request-available stale-major  (was: 
auto-unassigned pull-request-available)

I am the [Flink Jira Bot|https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot/] and I help 
the community manage its development. I see this issues has been marked as 
Major but is unassigned and neither itself nor its Sub-Tasks have been updated 
for 30 days. I have gone ahead and added a "stale-major" to the issue". If this 
ticket is a Major, please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards, 
please remove the label or in 7 days the issue will be deprioritized.


> Add contract in `LookupableTableSource` to specify the behavior when 
> lookupKeys contains null
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-13503
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13503
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Technical Debt
>          Components: Connectors / JDBC, Table SQL / API
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.0, 1.10.0
>            Reporter: Jing Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: auto-unassigned, pull-request-available, stale-major
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I think we should add contract in `LookupableTableSource` to specify expected 
> behavior when the lookupKeys contains null value.  
> For example, one input record of eval method is (null,1) which means to look 
> up data in (a,b) columns which key satisfy the requirement.  there are at 
> least three possibility here.
>   * to ignore null value, that is, in the above example, only looks `b = 1`
>   * to lookup `is value`, that is, in the above example, only looks `a is 
> null and b = 1`
>   * to return empty records, that is, in the above example, only looks `a = 
> null and b = 1`
> In fact, there are different behavior in current code. 
> For example, in Jdbc connector,
> The query template in `JdbcLookUpFunction` like:
> SELECT c, d, e, f from T where a = ? and b = ?
> If pass (null, 1) to `eval` method, it will generate the following query:
> SELECT c, d, e, f from T where a = null and b = 1
> Which always outputs empty records.
> BTW, Is this behavior reasonable?
> and the `InMemoryLookupableTableSource` behaviors like point 2 in the above 
> list.
> some private connector in Blink behaviors like point 1



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to