[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13907118#comment-13907118
]
Nick Dimiduk commented on HBASE-10573:
--------------------------------------
I'm curious about the decision to use Netty's classes here. In particular, I
believe the reason [~mcorgan] introduced the ByteRange interface was because
none of the existing "byte buffer" concepts allowed for buffer re-use. The
concern being for excessive GC during compactions. I looked at Netty's ByteBuf
a while back and found it didn't support instance reuse, thus was insufficient
for his requirement. Did I miss something?
> Use Netty 4
> -----------
>
> Key: HBASE-10573
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10573
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: hbase-10191
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> Assignee: Andrew Purtell
> Attachments: 10573.patch
>
>
> Pull in Netty 4 and sort out the consequences.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
