[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-1494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ferenc Gerlits updated MINIFICPP-1494:
--------------------------------------
    Description: 
There are some differences between the NiFi and MiNiFi implementations of 
InvokeHTTP.  I suspect these are not intentional, and we should change MiNiFi 
to behave in the same way as NiFi.
 #  When InvokeHTTP is timer-driven and the Method is GET, then NiFi does not 
require an incoming flow file, but MiNiFi does.
 # The NiFi version of InvokeHTTP has an output relationship called Original.  
This is called Success in MiNiFi; it should probably be renamed to Original.

TODO: any others?

*These changes could break some existing flow files; discuss whether this is 
acceptable.*

  was:
There are some differences between the NiFi and MiNiFi implementations of 
InvokeHTTP.  I suspect these are not intentional, and we should change MiNiFi 
to behave in the same way as NiFi.
 #  When InvokeHTTP is timer-driven and the Method is GET, then NiFi does not 
require an incoming flow file, but MiNiFi does.
 # The NiFi version of InvokeHTTP has an output relationship called Original.  
This is called Success in MiNiFi; it should probably be renamed to Original.

TODO: any others?

* These changes could break some existing flow files; discuss whether this is 
acceptable. *


> InvokeHTTP should behave in the same way as NiFi
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MINIFICPP-1494
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-1494
>             Project: Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ferenc Gerlits
>            Priority: Minor
>
> There are some differences between the NiFi and MiNiFi implementations of 
> InvokeHTTP.  I suspect these are not intentional, and we should change MiNiFi 
> to behave in the same way as NiFi.
>  #  When InvokeHTTP is timer-driven and the Method is GET, then NiFi does not 
> require an incoming flow file, but MiNiFi does.
>  # The NiFi version of InvokeHTTP has an output relationship called Original. 
>  This is called Success in MiNiFi; it should probably be renamed to Original.
> TODO: any others?
> *These changes could break some existing flow files; discuss whether this is 
> acceptable.*



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to