dsmiley commented on code in PR #1243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1243#discussion_r1060083238
##########
solr/core/src/test-files/solr/solr.xml:
##########
@@ -35,11 +35,6 @@
<int name="connTimeout">${connTimeout:15000}</int>
</shardHandlerFactory>
- <transientCoreCacheFactory name="transientCoreCacheFactory"
class="TransientSolrCoreCacheFactoryDefault">
Review Comment:
`<coreManager>` works for me because its a reasonable name today and in the
future if this class takes on core creation responsibility.
> The ticket doesn't even say that you are introducing a new type of
component , what the configuration looks like or what the responsibilities are
for that component type
From the JIRA issue: "This proposal would make SolrCores itself pluggable".
So there is no new type of component, and no change of responsibilities. Yeah
I could have shared what the plug-ability looks like. I'm thinking this is so
expert that we shouldn't really say anything about it in the ref guide.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
